What is a microsoft exchange server for outlook 2013
New architecture provides the below benefits: Having two server roles with Mailbox Server includes all the traditional components fount in Exchange 2010: the client access protocols, transport service, mailbox databases and unified messaging and the Client Access Server role to provide authentication, limited redirection and proxy services. What Are The Benefits On The Architecture Change By Having Two Server Roles In Exchange 2013? So Microsoft reduced the number of server roles to two as Client Access Server Role and Mailbox Server Role Nowadays, CPU horse power is less expensive and it is not a constrain factor, with that constraint lifted, primary goal for Exchange 2013 is simplicity of scale, hardware utilization and failure isolation. However server roles in Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 are tightly coupled Why Exchange 2013 Architecture Has Been Changed With Two Server Roles?Įxchange 20 were architect with certain technology constraint that existed at that time, where CPU performance was the Key constraint when Exchange 2007 was released and to alleviate the situation Server roles were introduced. CAS offers all usual client access protocols: HTTP, POP and IMAP, and SMTP Mailbox Server role: It holds the same function of Mailbox, the client access protocols, Hub Transport and Unified Messaging server role in Exchange 2010Ĭlient Access Server role: work as the client access server role in Exchange 2010, Exchange 2010 work as only stateless server, where it doesn’t do any data rendering, and nothing will be stored or queued in Client Access Server role. Server role architecture has been changed in Exchange 2013 which released with only two server roles. Legacy versions of Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 released with 5 server roles, ie, Mailbox, Client Access, Hub Transport, Unified Messaging and Edge Transport server.